(1) Counsel was not ineffective for not objecting to part of an expert witness’s testimony. It was appropriate to address the testimony during cross- examination.
(2) The district court did not exceed its discretion by allowing the State to ask Ex-Girlfriend, on cross-examination, about the specific instance of Defendant’s conduct where he refused to leave her house because it was relevant to assessing the credibility and weight of Ex-Girlfriend’s proffered testimony.