Garner v. Kadince
Garner v. Kadince, 2025 UT App 80 (per curiam)
Civil
The Utah Court of Appeals held:
- Although the attorneys admitted that their petition for interlocutory appeal contained AI-hallucinated caselaw, sanctions were still appropriate under Utah R. App. P. 40 because the “court takes submission of fake precedent seriously.”
- Practice tip: Every attorney has an ongoing duty to review and ensure the accuracy of their court filings.