The Utah Court of Appeals held:
(1) The district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing accountant to testify as rebuttal expert where disclosure of expert was procedurally proper.
(2) The district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony where court applied proper legal framework and where husband did not challenge any specific line-item amounts.
(3) The district court erred by not requiring husband to refund wife for half of attorney fees paid with pre-division marital funds.