(1) The district court acted within its discretion in valuing trust assets as of the date of divorce decree and awarding simple interest on trust assets. The district court’s commingling determination was not adequately supported where the court did not consider whether premarital assets retained their separate character.
(2) The district court’s commingling determination was not adequately supported where the court did not consider whether premarital assets retained their separate character.
(3) The district court abused its discretion in overlooking dissipation claims.
(4) The district court acted within its discretion in granting allowance for amounts paid to maintain marital home after entry of divorce decree.
(5) The district court acted within its discretion in not awarding interest on funds held on deposit with the court.