The Utah Court of Appeals held:
(1) The district court did not err in dismissing fraud claims where claims were barred by economic loss rule and where appellant failed to demonstrate an applicable exception.
(2) The district court did not err in dismissing unjust enrichment claim where contract governed rights and obligations of parties.
(3) The district court did not err in dismissing breach-of-contract claim where appellant failed to identify breach of contractual duty.
(4) The district court did not err in denying motion for leave to amend complaint where argument was inadequately briefed.