The Appellate Group

Mintz v. Mintz

Mintz v. Mintz, 2026 UT App 170 (Mortensen, J.)

FAMILY LAW

The Utah Court of Appeals held:

(1) Under the law of the case doctrine, of which the mandate rule is a branch, issues resolved by an appellate court on appeal generally bind that court on a subsequent appeal.
(2) Under the mandate rule, a district court must carry out the appellate court’s mandate and do nothing else.
(3) Judge Harris dissented, explaining that an appellate court should grant more deference to a district court’s interpretation of its own order, especially when that order is something that the district court, as opposed to the parties, drafted after hearing evidence. 

Read the full court opinion