The Utah Court of Appeals held:
(1) The district court erred in denying Defendant’s motion to exclude Torrential Downpour search results. The error was harmful as to 5/12 child sexual abuse material (CSAM) convictions.
(2) Defendant did not receive ineffective assistance related to (1) failure to move for directed verdict, (2) failure to impeach a witness, (3) failure to show additional portions of Defendant’s police interview, and (4) failure to object to improper expert testimony.