UDOT v. Boggess-Draper
UDOT v. Boggess-Draper, 2025 UT App 58 (Christiansen Forster, J.)
CIVIL
The Utah Court of Appeals held:
- The district court’s rulings allowing the post-valuation evidence and excluding the terms of the 2008 offer were within its discretion.
- The issue of project influence was not preserved.
- Because the district court misinterpreted the law regarding special and general benefits, the court erred when it denied Boggess’s motion in limine and allowed evidence regarding general benefits.