The Utah Court of Appeals held:
(1) Trial counsel does not provide ineffective assistance by choosing not to challenge prospective jurors for cause who initially indicate a potential bias, if the jurors subsequently reaffirm their commitment to follow the court’s instructions and remain impartial.
(2) The district court complies with its statutory duties under Utah Code § 77- 18-103, even if it proceeds to sentencing without entering explicit findings regarding an alleged inaccuracy in the PSI, as long as the court did not affirmatively find an inaccuracy existed. In cases where it would be reasonable to assume both parties could be right, an appellate court may infer the district court found the report was not technically inaccurate.