The Appellate Group

Alarm Protection Tech. v. Crandall

Alarm Protection Tech. v. Crandall, 2021 UT 26 (Lee, A.S.J.) (Petersen J., concurring, Durrant C.J. and Himonas J. joining)


Crandall sued APT over disputed unpaid commissions. He now appeals two district court orders. The Utah Supreme Court affirmed, holding:

  • Same holding on motion for return of excess proceeds and attorney fees as Alarm Protection Tech v. Bradburn, 2021 UT 25. In addition, the district court correctly ruled that Crandall’s rule 60(b) motion was both untimely and unsupported.

Read the full court opinion