State v. Christensen
State v. Christensen, 2025 UT App 86 (Oliver, J.)
Criminal
The Utah Court of Appeals held:
- Even assuming district court abused its discretion in denying Defendant’s motion to sever his charges, Defendant could not show he was harmed.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting body camera evidence because it was a prior consistent statement and not hearsay.