State v. Crutcher

State v. Crutcher, 2023 UT App 53 (Orme, J.)

Criminal Procedure

Crutcher entered a conditional guilty plea to first-degree aggravated murder after confessing to the racially motivated murder of his cellmate. A month later, he retracted his confession and asked to withdraw his plea. The district court denied his pre-plea motion to suppress, his post-plea motion to withdraw the guilty plea, and his counsel’s post-plea motion to withdraw. The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed, holding:

  • The district court correctly concluded that Crutcher presented no evidence of force or coercion and that his actions and statements were voluntary.
  • The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw.
  • The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw the guilty plea without first holding an evidentiary hearing.
  • Practice Tip: The Court of Appeals declined to order appointed post-conviction counsel. By statute, that decision rests with the district court, not the court of appeals.

Read the full court opinion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *