State v. Sparling

State v. Sparling, 2024 UT App 59 (Harris, J.)

Criminal

During a traffic stop officers found methamphetamine in a car Defendant was driving. The State charged Defendant with drug and traffic offenses. After a bench trial, Defendant was acquitted of some of the drug-related charges but convicted of possessing methamphetamine. Defendant appealed that conviction, arguing insufficient evidence. The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed, holding:

  • The evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support an inference that Defendant had both the power and the intent to exercise dominion and control over the methamphetamine.

Read the full court opinion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *