The Appellate Group

UDOT v. Boggess-Draper

UDOT v. Boggess-Draper, 2025 UT App 58 (Christiansen Forster, J.)

CIVIL

The Utah Court of Appeals held:

  • The district court’s rulings allowing the post-valuation evidence and excluding the terms of the 2008 offer were within its discretion.
  • The issue of project influence was not preserved.
  • Because the district court misinterpreted the law regarding special and general benefits, the court erred when it denied Boggess’s motion in limine and allowed evidence regarding general benefits.

Read the full court opinion